6 Best Smithery Alternatives in 2026
Last updated: 2026-04-10
Smithery is the leading MCP server platform, but it's not the only way to discover and manage MCP integrations. Whether you need more pre-built service connections, better team management, or a curated quality-first approach, here are the strongest alternatives we've tested.
Looking for alternatives to Smithery (from $0/mo)?
Top Alternatives at a Glance
| # | Tool | Best For | Rating | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Composio | Teams needing many authenticated service connections | 4.3 | Free / $0/mo | |
| 2 | Pipedream MCP | Developers who need broad API access | 4.2 | Free / $0/mo | |
| 3 | Glama | Organizations managing complex MCP setups | 4 | Free / $0/mo | |
| 4 | Cloudflare MCP Server Gateway | Developers deploying their own MCP servers at scale | 4.1 | Free / $0/mo | |
| 5 | MCP Hub | Developers who want vetted MCP server listings | 3.9 | Free / $0/mo | |
| 6 | MCP.so | Developers who want a lightweight search interface | 3.7 | Free / $0/mo |
1. Composio — More pre-built integrations with managed OAuth and enterprise controls.
Composio
$0/mo
Free tierMore pre-built integrations with managed OAuth and enterprise controls.
Composio is the most comprehensive integration platform for AI agents, offering 250+ pre-built tool connections with managed authentication. It serves as both an MCP server provider and a broader agent tooling platform, making it the fastest way to connect AI assistants to external services.
Pros
- Largest library of pre-built integrations — GitHub, Slack, Jira, Google, and 200+ more
- Handles OAuth and authentication automatically — the hardest part of building integrations
- Framework-agnostic — works with MCP and also LangChain, CrewAI, Autogen
- Enterprise-grade access controls and audit logging
Cons
- Complex setup for advanced configurations
- Free tier has strict action limits for high-volume use
- Some integrations have limited action coverage
- Documentation can lag behind rapid feature releases
2. Pipedream MCP — Widest API coverage with 2,500+ integrations through one connection.
Pipedream MCP
$0/mo
Free tierWidest API coverage with 2,500+ integrations through one connection.
Pipedream MCP leverages Pipedream's established automation platform to offer the widest range of API integrations as MCP server tools. A single MCP connection gives AI assistants access to 2,500+ services with managed OAuth, making it the breadth leader for MCP integrations.
Pros
- Massive integration library — 2,500+ APIs available through one MCP connection
- Mature OAuth handling from Pipedream's years in the automation space
- One server connection gives access to thousands of tools
- Custom workflows let you chain actions across services
Cons
- Individual integration depth can be shallow — basic CRUD actions only
- Free tier has limited invocation counts
- MCP-specific features are newer and less battle-tested than core Pipedream
- Complex setup for custom workflow-based tools
3. Glama — Better centralized management for teams with many MCP servers.
Glama
$0/mo
Free tierBetter centralized management for teams with many MCP servers.
Glama is an MCP server gateway and management platform that centralizes how you discover, connect, and monitor MCP servers. Its team features and authentication management make it valuable for organizations, while its gateway approach simplifies multi-client MCP setups.
Pros
- Centralized management for all MCP server connections
- Strong authentication handling for servers that need API keys
- Team features let organizations share server configurations
- Clean dashboard for monitoring server usage
Cons
- Adds a management layer that some developers find unnecessary
- Smaller server catalog than Smithery
- Gateway architecture can add latency
- Enterprise features are still maturing
4. Cloudflare MCP Server Gateway — Best infrastructure for building and hosting custom MCP servers.
Cloudflare MCP Server Gateway
$0/mo
Free tierBest infrastructure for building and hosting custom MCP servers.
Cloudflare's MCP Server Gateway lets developers deploy MCP servers on Cloudflare Workers, providing global edge distribution with serverless scaling. It's the infrastructure-first approach to MCP hosting — ideal for developers who want to build custom MCP servers with production-grade reliability.
Pros
- Deploy MCP servers globally with minimal configuration
- Cloudflare's edge network provides low-latency connections worldwide
- Serverless architecture means zero infrastructure management
- Free tier is generous for development and moderate production use
Cons
- Requires Cloudflare Workers knowledge for custom servers
- Less turn-key than Smithery or Composio for pre-built integrations
- Tied to Cloudflare's platform ecosystem
- MCP-specific tooling is still early compared to core Workers platform
5. MCP Hub — More curated, quality-focused server recommendations.
MCP Hub
$0/mo
Free tierMore curated, quality-focused server recommendations.
MCP Hub is a curated directory of MCP servers focused on quality over quantity. Its reviewed listings and clear categorization help developers find reliable integrations quickly, though its smaller catalog and lack of hosted infrastructure mean it serves as a discovery tool rather than a full platform.
Pros
- Curated quality — servers are reviewed and rated before listing
- Clear categorization makes finding the right server fast
- Detailed installation guides reduce setup friction
- Community-driven with transparent contribution process
Cons
- Smaller catalog than Smithery — more selective but fewer options
- No hosted server infrastructure — all servers run locally
- Limited search and filtering compared to larger registries
- Newer platform with less established community
6. MCP.so — Clean, simple directory for quick MCP server discovery.
MCP.so
$0/mo
Free tierClean, simple directory for quick MCP server discovery.
MCP.so is a searchable directory of MCP servers that helps developers discover integrations for their AI assistants. It offers solid categorization and direct GitHub links but serves purely as a discovery tool without hosting or management features.
Pros
- Clean, searchable interface for finding MCP servers
- Good coverage across server categories
- Direct links to GitHub repos for transparency and code review
- Regular updates as new servers are published
Cons
- Directory only — no hosting, management, or monitoring features
- Less curation than MCP Hub — quantity over quality filtering
- No built-in installation tooling
- Community is still growing
Why Look for Smithery Alternatives?
How We Chose These Alternatives
Related Guides
Frequently Asked Questions
Which alternative has the most integrations?
Is there a free alternative to Smithery?
Can I use multiple platforms together?
Explore More Tools
Not sure this is the right fit? Try our interactive tools.